Google condemns DOJ's proposal as threat to consumer privacy and innovation

Google has voiced strong opposition to the US Department of Justice's (DOJ) sweeping proposal in its ongoing lawsuit over Google’s search distribution agreements. In a company blog post, the tech giant’s President of Global Affairs and Chief Legal Officer, Kent Walker, described the proposal as a “radical interventionist agenda” that could harm consumers, stifle innovation, and undermine America’s global leadership in technology.
The DOJ’s proposal, which extends beyond the court's initial decision, includes significant changes to Google’s operations, such as the forced sale of Chrome and potentially Android, and the mandatory disclosure of personal search queries to foreign and domestic entities. Google argues these measures would jeopardize user privacy and the security of its services.

The company also highlighted the potential risks to artificial intelligence (AI) advancements, claiming the DOJ’s measures could discourage investment in one of the most transformative technologies of the era. AI, a domain where Google plays a leading role, is vital for global innovation and competitiveness.
Additionally, the proposal could affect partnerships with companies like Mozilla, whose Firefox browser benefits from revenue-sharing agreements with Google. Such drastic interventions, Google warned, could hobble its popular Search services and impose burdensome regulations, including the implementation of multiple "choice screens" for users of its Pixel devices.

“This extreme proposal represents unprecedented government overreach,” Walker said, adding that it could harm small businesses, developers, and consumers alike, while also undermining America’s position as a technological leader.
Google plans to file its response next month and present its broader case in the coming year. The company remains committed to defending its services and innovations, which, it emphasized, have gained the trust of millions of users worldwide.
As the debate unfolds, the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the technology sector and consumer experiences globally.

Also Read: DOJ’s push to break Google’s hold: A closer look at proposed Chrome divestiture Part 1